Source in the Spotlight
The Early Islamic Menorah Copper Coin as a Material Case of Co-Production
Sometime during the last fifty years of the Umayyad’s reign, a unique copper coin was issued in one of the western regions recently conquered by the first dynasty of Islam. On the reverse side of the coin is the second part of the šahāda, the Islamic profession of faith, which reads, “Muḥammad is the messenger of God”, while on the obverse is the first part of the Islamic creed, “There is no god but God, alone”, a formula commonly found on Islamic coins of the period. However, the obverse also features the Jewish symbol par excellence, the menorah, making this coin a fascinating case of co-production.
Event: Open Zoom Seminar
Open Seminar with Marianne Moyaert (Leuven)
Dec. 16, 2024 9:30-11:00am EST / 3:30-5:00pm CET zoom
Learn moreEvent: Open Zoom Seminar
Open Seminar with Dina el-Omari (Münster)
Jan. 20, 2025 9:30-11am EST / 3:30-5pm CET zoom
Learn moreAbout
Who we are
The project is coordinated by Katharina Heyden, Professor for Ancient History of Christianity and Interreligious Encounters at the University of Bern (Switzerland), and David Nirenberg, Leon Levy Professor at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton (U.S.), and includes a network of collaborators across North America, Europe, and the Middle East.
New Case Study
The Older, the Better: Forging a Neo-Pagan Tradition in Co-Production with Christianity and Islam
The Laurentian library in Florence holds many medieval copies of writings of the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, most of them still dangling the long chains which once bound them to the wooden desks of Michaelangelo’s library in San Lorenzo. One manuscript, copied in 1318, looks at first glance like just another late-Byzantine copy of Herodotus’s classic work. But a century or so after its creation an eccentric philosopher, George Gemistos, better known as “Pletho”, went through the manuscript carefully editing, deleting, or rewriting selected passages. His alterations bring Herodotus into line with a new history of philosophy which Gemistos wrote as part of his clandestine revival of ancient Greek Paganism. Like so many of Gemistos’s “ancient” novelties, this looks like one side of a competitive dialogue with the monotheistic religions of his day. The Florentine manuscript illustrates how the dynamics of co-production, visible within Judaism, Christianity and Islam, could also spill over their borders into the more esoteric movements of the late medieval world.